"To me, the conversation illuminated primarily liberal arrogance — the 
implication that conservatives don’t have anything significant to add to
 the discussion...When perspectives are unrepresented in discussions, when some kinds of 
thinkers aren’t at the table, classrooms become echo chambers rather 
than sounding boards — and we all lose...Some
 liberals think that right-wingers self-select away from academic paths 
in part because they are money-grubbers who prefer more lucrative 
professions. But that doesn’t explain why there are conservative math 
professors but not many right-wing anthropologists...It’s also liberal poppycock that there aren’t smart conservatives or evangelicals."
" 'Universities are unlike other institutions in that they absolutely 
require that people challenge each other so that the truth can emerge 
from limited, biased, flawed individuals,' he says. 'If they lose 
intellectual diversity, or if they develop norms of "safety" that trump 
challenge, they die. And this is what has been happening since the 
1990s.' "
--by Nicholas Kristof, "A Confession of Liberal Intolerance"
(http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/opinion/sunday/a-confession-of-liberal-intolerance.html?_r=0)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment