"To me, the conversation illuminated primarily liberal arrogance — the
implication that conservatives don’t have anything significant to add to
the discussion...When perspectives are unrepresented in discussions, when some kinds of
thinkers aren’t at the table, classrooms become echo chambers rather
than sounding boards — and we all lose...Some
liberals think that right-wingers self-select away from academic paths
in part because they are money-grubbers who prefer more lucrative
professions. But that doesn’t explain why there are conservative math
professors but not many right-wing anthropologists...It’s also liberal poppycock that there aren’t smart conservatives or evangelicals."
" 'Universities are unlike other institutions in that they absolutely
require that people challenge each other so that the truth can emerge
from limited, biased, flawed individuals,' he says. 'If they lose
intellectual diversity, or if they develop norms of "safety" that trump
challenge, they die. And this is what has been happening since the
1990s.' "
--by Nicholas Kristof, "A Confession of Liberal Intolerance"
(http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/opinion/sunday/a-confession-of-liberal-intolerance.html?_r=0)
No comments:
Post a Comment